Understanding Vote Centers:
Adoption, Administration, and Voter Experience

A multi-year study of Election Day vote center implementation across the United States, examining administrative impacts, voter experiences, and stakeholder support.

Anita Manion, PhD
University of Missouri-St. Louis
David Kimball, PhD
University of Missouri-St. Louis
Jake Shaw, PhD
DePauw University

Vote Centers at a Glance

625
Local jurisdictions
using vote centers
19
States with
vote center jurisdictions
~30%
Of U.S. registered voters
served by vote centers
2020
Inflection point — adoption
accelerated sharply after

Vote centers allow any registered voter within a jurisdiction to cast a ballot at any polling location on Election Day, rather than being assigned to a specific precinct. This model requires real-time voter check-in systems and has seen rapid adoption across the Midwest and Plains regions in particular.

Vote Centers Across the United States

625 jurisdictions in 19 states — with geographic concentration in the Midwest and Plains regions. View the presentation and research paper below for more detailed information.

Map of jurisdictions with Election Day Vote Centers in 2025

Additional Research Findings

View Research Paper on National Vote Center Experience →
View Research Paper on Vote Center Turnout →

Key Results

Administrative Efficiency

Vote centers dramatically reduce the operational footprint of election administration. Jurisdictions report roughly half as many physical polling locations to staff and maintain, and corresponding reductions in poll worker recruitment needs.

Provisional Ballot Reduction

Because vote centers eliminate "wrong precinct" errors, jurisdictions see sharp reductions in both the number of provisional ballots cast and the share of provisionals that are ultimately rejected.

Voter Location Experience

Survey data from 2024 show that vote center users reported somewhat less ease locating their polling place compared to precinct voters — an important equity and communication consideration for implementing jurisdictions.

Implementation Quality Matters

The research finds that vote centers prove most effective in larger jurisdictions and when paired with robust voter communication. Access and equity require ongoing attention, particularly for voters with limited transportation or information access.

Reductions Reported by Jurisdictions

Polling Locations ~50% reduction
Poll Workers Required ~30% reduction
Provisional Ballots Cast ~50% reduction
Rejected Provisional Ballots ~40% reduction

Support for Vote Centers

Case studies from St. Louis County, Missouri and Fresno County, California reveal strong support from both voters and election workers.

Voters
72%
favor vote centers
(St. Louis & Fresno Counties)
Poll Workers
93%
prefer working vote centers
over traditional precincts
Election Officials
Strong
support reported across
implementing jurisdictions
Research Data

Jurisdiction Database

Our database catalogs all known jurisdictions in the United States as of 2025 that have adopted Election Day vote centers, including state, county, and adoption year.

Access the Database

About the Authors

Anita Manion

Anita Manion, PhD

University of Missouri-St. Louis
maniona@umsl.edu
David Kimball

David Kimball, PhD

University of Missouri-St. Louis
dkimball@umsl.edu
Jake Shaw

Jake Shaw, PhD

DePauw University
jshaw@umsl.edu